Micro-Level Outsourcing an Under Cover Opportunity for Small Players (Or Entities) – Crystallization of A New Market Sub-Domain

From the perspective of Patent Reforms Act 2005 post-implementation scenario, no matter what is the final outcome regarding "limit access to injunctions", i.e. Heads or Tails, the outsourcing market clearly exhibits an inbuilt capacity to develop. At this point, it is utmost essential for both, service buyers and vendors (or sellers), to create or discover and detect one or more of the following market domains and sub-domains thereof, such as novel, explicit unexploited, implicit unexploited (or under cover) and all potential permutations and combinations thereof (i.e. hybrid market domains and sub-domains thereof). Subsequent to this, customized outsourcing models, which may be adaptive-dynamic, may be implemented in the aforementioned market domains and sub-domains thereof to get businesses.

More to the point, considering the outcomes of the legislation being discussed this week in Washington as “Heads” (or Win) it appears that subsequent to the implementation of proposed amendments suggested under the Patent Reforms Act 2005, US jobs may be outsourced. However, interesting points that appear overlooked are the advantages despite the aforementioned outcomes are “Tails” (or Loss). Noticeable here is the fact that in the context of the Patent Reforms Act 2005 post-implementation scenario no matter what is the final outcome, i.e. Heads or Tails, there still arises a Win-Win situation under the aforementioned scenario. Specifically, in light of the assortment of issues raised in connection with the Patent Reforms Act 2005 in numerous articles note must be taken of the fact that “Micro-Level Outsourcing” is an under cover opportunity for small players (or entities) thereby facilitating crystallization of a new market sub-domain. That said, small entities (or buyers) need to understand that there is an under cover opportunity which needs to be explored on an urgent basis.